Your Status: Logged out Log in

Three Strikes Law

Member rating: No Rating | Words: 1760 | Submitted: Mon Jan 14 2008

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 7 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

I am in support of opposing the "Three Strikes, You're Out" law that has largely been in debate. For more than past 20 years, state and federal crime control policies have been based on the belief that harsh sentencing laws will deter people from committing crimes. But today, with more than one million people behind bars, and state budgets depleted by the huge costs of prison construction, we are no safer than before. New approaches to the problem of crime are needed, but instead, our political leaders keep serving up the same old strategies. Take the so-called "Three Strikes, You're Out" law, for example. Embraced by state legislators, Congress and the President himself, this law imposes a mandatory life sentence without parole on offenders convicted of certain crimes. Despite its catchy baseball metaphor, I feel that this law is pointless for the following reasons. First, "Three Strikes" is...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,871 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk