Your Status: Logged out Log in

Do you consider intelligence to have a stronger genetic or environmental basis?  

Member rating: 4 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 7 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Do you consider intelligence to have a stronger genetic or environmental basis? Since the term nature-nurture was first initiated by Galton (1883, c.f. Plomin, 1988) the question of whether intelligence has a stronger environmental or genetic basis has been the source of much controversy and debate (Bouchard., Lykken., McGue., Segal., & Tallegen, 1990a, 1991., Bouchard & McGue, 1981., Hernstein & Murray, 1994., Plomin, 1988., Scarr 1997). Traditionally, research into intelligence has been diverged by two opposing positions; Behavioural Genetic Theory and Socialization Theory (Scarr, 1997). Whilst Socialization theory provides useful insights into the qualitative nature of differences in behaviour and intelligence, methods used by such research are criticised as being "antiquated" and "confounded" (Scarr, 1997, p.34) hampered by their inability to include genetically informative designs (Baumrind, 1993., Hoffman, 1991., Scarr, 1997). Behavioural genetic theory on the other hand not only describes the genetic contribution on intelligence (Bouchard & McGue, 1981.,...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 149,979 others
Register Now

 

User Reviews:

2 out of 5 stars Reviewed by: willow30, 2006-09-22

"Well researched but hard to follow,the use of paragraphs would be good"

Was this review helpful to you?