Your Status: Logged out Log in

'Great historian or great liar' Which description best fits Herodotus?  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jan 13 2005

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

'Great historian or great liar' Which description best fits Herodotus? A historian; one who writes or compiles a chronological record of events; a chronicler. So what makes a historian great? Surely this all depends on how the historian records history and then the individuals' view of how history should be recorded? As a form of literature or a branch science? According to Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Herodotus was the epitome of a great historian and a literary genius. So what distinguishes a liar from a story teller, an entertainer? A liar tries to pass falsehoods of as true whereas a storyteller never claims that their stories are anything other than that, a story. If Plutarch is taken in a certain way and believed, there isn't a difference between the two, when it comes to Herodotus' work. There are two perspectives of the "historian" Herodotus. He is both regarded as the father of history,...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,038 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk