Your Status: Logged out Log in

Discuss critically the claim that films cannot be serious works of art.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jun 03 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 5 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Discuss critically the claim that films cannot be serious works of art. The Oxford English dictionary defines art as, 'production of something beautiful; skill or ability; paintings or sculptures etc; subjects other than sciences requiring sensitive understanding rather than use of measurement;' On further examination of the word art in a thesaurus it suggests other descriptions as 'painting or sculpture'. As you will already see there is no mention of the word film or filmmaker in either of these descriptions. However the Oxford dictionary's analysis that art can be defined as something beautiful, a skill or ability or something requiring sensitive understanding does help in arguing that film's and film making is the greatest art form of the modern era. In it's most basic form films are simply photographic pictures imprinted on celluloid projected on to a screen but films are also a form of expression that can not only entertain...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk