Your Status: Logged out Log in

Tort Law - Negligence  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Dec 29 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 9 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

"Negligence as a tort is a breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage to the claimant." (Rogers, 2002) As Owens (2001) explains, in order to succeed with a claim for negligence, the claimant has to prove a number of factors which are individually specified in each of the following cases. To establish if the defendant is negligent, the claimant has to prove the following questions: Is there a duty of care? Was there a breach of the duty? Was the damage caused by the breach? The principle behind the duty of care was established in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) called the neighbour principle. A neighbour is defined by Keenan (2001) "persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act ...". Caparro Industries plc v Dickman (1990) set-up three questions which have to be answered in order to establish whether the defendant owes a duty of...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,383 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk