Your Status: Logged out Log in

The principle requirements of the tort of negligence.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 3 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

The principle requirements of the tort of negligence are that the defendant (D) should owe the plaintiff a duty of care that there should be a breach of that duty and that breach of duty should cause actionable damage to the plaintiff, which is not too remote. Donoghue v Stevenson1 established the principle that D owes a plaintiff a duty of care if there is a relationship of neighbourhood in the sense that the plaintiff can be reasonably foreseen as likely to be affected by Ds act or omission. Put by Lord Atkin, ' persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question.' The Caparo2 case provided an extension of the rules set out in Donoghue v Stevenson. Lord Bridge's opinion...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,186 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk