Your Status: Logged out Log in

Surgeon’s Liability and Claims against the Surgeon  

Member rating: 7 out of 10 stars (6 votes) | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jul 11 2002

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 7 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES Tort 2001/2001 Non-Assessed Coursework Essay Surgeon's Liability and Claims against the Surgeon "[T]he patient's broad consent to being operated on is effective to protect the surgeon from an action in battery. If the surgeon makes an error leading to the failure of the operation, the claimants complaint is not that he was operated on against his will but that the outcome of the operation was detrimental to him" What is implied from the above statement is that a patient who gives "broad" consent to an operation will have no cause of action in battery against the surgeon. What then of the surgeon who performs additional procedures without the consent of the patient1, or whilst the patient mentally ill and lacks capacity to give consent2 or he is forced to operate whilst the patient is unconscious following a road traffic accident?3 All these situations would seem to indicate...

To see the full version of this document, and 143,642 others

Register Now