Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
The distinctive nature of law and convention in relation to the British constitution.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: 1245 | Submitted: Sat Apr 26 2008
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
'In British constitutional theory and practice there is a clear-cut distinction between law and convention. Law derives from common law and statute, and is enforceable by the courts. Convention derives from constitutional principle and practice and is not enforceable by the courts. Law remains in force until changed by the statute. Convention may change with the changing times. Law, at least if statutory, is ascertainable in precise form. Convention is often imprecise and may be nowhere formulated in categorical terms.' Is this an accurate explanation of the distinctive nature of law and convention in relation to the British constitution? British constitution is very unique if compared to other nations. This is because British have an unwritten constitution. This unwritten constitution is constructed partly out of the general sources of law and comprises understandings and practices that are not legally binding. There are two main important rules which govern them. They are...
To see the full version of this document, and 143,642 others
