Your Status: Logged out Log in

The doctrine of Informed consent  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 28 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Informed Consent The doctrine of Informed consent It is important to distinguish between informed consent as a doctrine and informed consent as a term used imprecisely to mean a valid consent, one where the "broad nature" (Chatterton v. Gerson [1981]) of the treatment proposed has been explained to the patient. In the context of this essay, informed consent refers to the doctrine which underlines the amount of information that a patient should be given in relation to the risks of treatment over and above those encapsulated with the "broad nature" requirement of the inevitable and inherent risks posed by the proposed treatment. Ethically, the issue under consideration is the right to self-determination and the mantra from all proponents of informed consent, as described in Largey v. Rotham, is that a patient cannot validly consent to the risks associated with treatment unless he has been told of them in advance. This posses a...

To see the full version of this document, and 143,651 others

Register Now