Your Status: Logged out Log in

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Member rating: No Rating | Words: 2357 | Submitted: Tue Feb 26 2008

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Law of Evidence - Assignment 2 After over 100 years the provisions of the Criminal Evidence Act 1898 relating to the cross examination of the accused are set to be fundamentally reconsidered. Three key reports have recommended such action. Lord Justice Auld in the Criminal Court Review, the Government in "The Way Ahead" policy paper and the Law Commission in their report Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal Proceedings have all outlined solutions to solve the problems that allow the current rules for cross examination of defendants under the Criminal Evidence Act 1898 to operate unfairly and distort the process. Although most agree that reform is necessary how this should be done has proved a more difficult question to answer. Broadly speaking the Criminal Evidence Act 1898, sections 1(2) and 1(3) state that an accused cannot be cross-examined on his or her previous misconduct. The main reasons advanced for the rule are...

To see the full version of this document, and 143,651 others

Register Now