Your Status: Logged out Log in

Legal Method & Systems.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Legal Method & Systems Non-Assessed Essay In this case, the facts are that on August 30th 2000, the defendant, L, was observed by a police officer throwing an object over a wall in Becklow Gardens, which later turned out to be a lock-knife. Lock knives are banned under s 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. The appellant said, on police interview, that the knife was his, that he bought to show to his brother's friends and that he threw it over the wall. The Youth Court convicted the defendant under the Act, and the defendant argued that the defence required under s 139 of the Act was only compatible with Article 6 of the ECHR if it was construed as per section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 to impose only an evidential burden. The Youth Court held there to be a probative burden on the defendant, as set...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk