Family law - Medical treatment - Human fertilisation - Sperm mistakenly used in IVF implantation resulting in genetic father not being husband of genetic mother.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
╨╧рб▒с > ■ . 0 ■ - ье┴ 5@ Ё┐ 0 К bjbj╧2╧2 (( нX нX ▄ н И Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ о о о о 8 ц Є $ о ' v " " " " " " " " ж и и и и и и $ Э R я ╠ Ъ " " " " " ╠ Ъ Ъ " " с t t t " Ъ " Ъ " ж t " ж t t Ж Ъ Ъ Ж " АШp└╙С╟ о " Ж ж ў 0 ' Ж " R Ж о о Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ Ъ Ж " " t " " " " " ╠ ╠ t Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A and others [2003] EWHC 259 (QB) Family law Ч Medical treatment Ч Human fertilisation Ч Sperm mistakenly used in IVF implantation resulting in genetic father not being husband of genetic mother Ч Whether genetic father entitled to declaration of paternity Ч Family Law Act 1986, s 55A (as amended) Ч Human Embryology and Fertilisation Act 1990, s 28(2)(3) Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v A and others [2003] EWHC 259 (QB) QBD: Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P: 26 February 2003 A husband was not to be treated as the father of a child by s 28 of the Human Embryology and Fertilisation Act 1990 where he had not consented to the placing in his wife of the actual embryo that, due to a fundamental error, was placed in her and resulted in the child, nor...


