Your Status: Logged out Log in

Evaluate the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 is consistent with the traditional understanding of parliamentary sovereignty.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 13 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Evaluate the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 is consistent with the traditional understanding of parliamentary sovereignty. How is it that the British courts feel bound to disapply acts of parliament inconsistent with EU law, but not those inconsistent with European Human Rights law. Introduction In order to approach this question I shall focus on three areas; the Human Rights Act 1998 in relation to parliamentary sovereignty, British courts and the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU as an influence on British courts. Although it could be argued that the Human Rights Act 1998 is now entrenched into our constitution and legal system, this is not so much the case. In reality, the Act is no different to any other statute law and may be overturned by Parliament at any time; such is the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. This will continue to be the case, so long as...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,186 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk