Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Advise the Rummidge Society for the Homeless as to the grounds they may have for challenging this decision by way of judicial review.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Sun Nov 07 2004
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
The [fictional] Inner City Regeneration Act provides for the establishment of the Inner City Regeneration Fund, to be administered by a new body called the Authority for Regeneration of Inner Cities [ARIC]. Section 1 of the Act provides that in considering applications for grants ARIC should seek "to promote initiatives designed to address problems presented to inner cities by homeless persons". The Act does not provide any mechanism for appealing against ARIC's decisions. ARIC refused an application for a grant made by Rummidge Society for the Homeless [RSFH] to replace the heating system in their shelter for homeless persons, located just off Old Street in Rummidge Inner City. In their application the Society had indicated that without this financial assistance the shelter would probably have to close. This would mean that there would be no overnight accommodation for homeless persons in the Inner City, which could cause problems for...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 146,871 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
