Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
The distinctions between void and voidable marriages serve no purpose in modern family law and should be abolished.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Family Law 22114 2002-13295 Written Work 2003-2004 Semester1 The distinctions between void and voidable marriages serve no purpose in modern family law and should be abolished. Discuss To discuss the distinctions between void and voidable marriages, we must first establish that they are not the sole types of marriage. Firstly, there is a valid marriage; one where the ceremony follows the correct formalities and there are no defects at all. The fourth, and often ignored category is that of non-marriage; a ceremony that is so far removed from a valid marriage, it is not a marriage at all, e.g. in the case of Ghandi v Patel1. In answering the question, it is inevitable that we discuss the grounds for void and voidable marriages and the differences between them. The law tells us in the Marriage Act 1949, what is a valid marriage, and in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the law tells us how a marriage is...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others
