Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Briefly explain the key differences between the three types of Alternative Dispute Resolution and explain why they are preferable to the ordinary civil courts.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: 802 | Submitted: Wed Jun 20 2007
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
2. Briefly explain the key differences between the three types of Alternative Dispute Resolution and explain why they are preferable to the ordinary civil courts. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) includes methods of dispute resolution, such as arbitration, conciliation and mediation, all of which fall outside of governmental judicial proceedings, a course of action which can involve a lot of time and financial commitment. These methods of dispute resolution are relatively novel and have many advantages over the more traditional methods - those of civil court proceedings and administrative tribunals - in that they are swifter and often less expensive. This essay will examine the key differences between the above three methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution and will also explain their advantages over the ordinary civil courts. Arbitration is most similar to legal proceedings, whereby each side makes an argument as to the merits of their 'case' and a trained arbitrator decides the...
To see the full version of this document, and 143,642 others
