Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Discussion of the quotation from Advocate General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
The quotation from Advocate General Jacobs in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council 1 arises as a result of a challenge to annul a regulation2 that had an adverse impact upon their businesses. The issues before the court were whether the requirements that for applicants to have sufficient Locus Standi to bring such an action the measure contested must be of "Direct and individual concern"3 to the applicants. The starting point in discussing the context of the quote is to establish what requirements must be met in order for such an action to be brought under Art 230. Firstly, there are three categories of applicants, Privileged, including Member States, The Council or Commission; those institutions protecting their prerogatives such as the European Parliament and European Central Bank, who all have standing and those, as in the present case, that concern individuals or Non-Privileged applicants who must establish such standing. In order for...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 146,186 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
