| Essay Title |
Rating |
What was the 'less eligibility' principle that underpinned the 1834 Poor Law - was it reasonable in the context of the time?
|
Not rated
|
What was the most influential period in the development of the criminal law and the associated institutions.
|
Not rated
|
What, if any, is the justification for inchoate offences?
|
Not rated
|
Whatever the intention of Parliament in creating statutes, it cannot accurately be established without reference to Hansard. Methods of statutory interpretation which did not allow Hansard to be used were guesswork. Discuss.
|
Not rated
|
When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule.
|
|
When Lord Woolf compiled his report in 1996, Access to Justice, he identified a range of problems with the civil justice system.
|
Not rated
|
Where different types of individual civil cases are tried in the courts and what the financial implications are.
|
|
Where does ultimate power lie in the UK constitution?
|
Not rated
|
Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious grounds, as explained later) the result is to introduce great uncertainty into the law.
|
Not rated
|
Whether to sueIn civil cases, it is up to the potential claimant (formerly called the plaintiff) to decide whether or not to begin legal proceedings.
|
Not rated
|
White-Collar Crime.
|
Not rated
|
Who is and who isn't eligible for jury service within the English legal system. And how is a jury selected. How effective is trial by jury? Consider any alternatives and suggest improvements.
|
Not rated
|
Why are opportunity reduction-based approaches to crime prevention attractive to policy-makers and what are the main problems associated with their theoretical bases and practical implication?
|
|
Why do individuals obey the law? Is it from fear of persecution, from genuine conviction or for prudential and utilitarian reasons?
|
Not rated
|
Why has the House of Lords' attempt in Street-v-Mountford to restore a clear distinction between a
|
|
Why has the House of Lords' attempt in Street-v-Mountford to restore a clear distinction between a
|
|
Why is it necessary for the judiciary to interpret statues?
|
Not rated
|
Why might precedent cause problems for the development of Law?
|
Not rated
|
Why was the Old Poor Law replaced in 1834 and not before?
|
Not rated
|
Why was The Old Poor Law under pressure?
|
Not rated
|
Why Was the Poor Law Reformed in 1834?
|
Not rated
|
Why was their so much opposition to the new poor law?
|
Not rated
|
Why was there so much variation in the judicial prosecution of witchcraft within Early Modern Europe?
|
Not rated
|
Wild life crime is extremely varied, does not attract funding and is only now beginning to gain some priority (Brennan A. M (02/03/04).
|
Not rated
|
Will the justice system suffer as a result of publicly supported settlement facilitation?
|
Not rated
|
Logged out
