Your Status: Logged out Log in

law of evidence

Member rating: No Rating | Words: 3421 | Submitted: Fri Aug 03 2007

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 12 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Law of Evidence Assessed Coursework An analysis of the law relating to the admissibility of expert opinion evidence in criminal trials. As a general proposition, the rule in relation to criminal trials is that opinion evidence is inadmissible; a witness may only testify with regard to facts which he actually perceived and not of inferences drawn from those perceptions. In a criminal trial, the drawing of inferences is for the jury or other tribunal of fact and it is up to them to reach an opinion in any given matter, not the witness. Traditionally, the reason for this is that an opinion on its own is seen to have little, if any, probative weight and as such, if admitted, would usurp and undermine the very function of the trier of fact. In civil trials, the rule has been largely abrogated, however this is probably due to the fact that the vast majority of civil cases...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,871 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk