Your Status: Logged out Log in

"Should Fiscal and Trusts Law Privileges be separated?"  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 7 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Module Title: Property and Trust 3: Coursework Assignment 2003 - 2004 ASSIGNMENT 1 "Should Fiscal and Trusts Law Privileges be separated?" 'It has been contended on a number of recent occasions that the linking of fiscal and trusts law privileges to the same definition of "charitable" produces unsatisfactory results: in other words, that the decision in Pemsel's case should be reversed. To break this link by confining the fiscal privileges to a narrower range of purposes than those which attract the trusts law privileges would, it is alleged, be advantageous in two respects. First, fiscal privileges would cease to be available to a range of organisations (such as animal charities, or obscure religious sects) which are on the periphery of "charity" and do not really deserve them. Secondly, purpose trusts of a public nature which presently fall foul of the rules as to certainty of objects because fiscal pressures have excluded them from the definition...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,383 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk