Your Status: Logged out Log in

The Constitution & the Supreme Court  

Member rating: 2 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jul 11 2002

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

The Constitution & the Supreme Court Is it inherent in the nature of judicial review that the Constitution is in a constant state of revision by the Supreme Court? The question identifies a relationship between an institution and a document, this relationship is mediated through a process. The question tries to identify whether an essence of this process is to ensure that the institution is constantly revising the document. Thus the question can be answered affirmatively if we discover that an integral feature of the judicial review process is to allow the Supreme Court to revise the Constitution. To proceed we need to understand the nature of the judicial review that the Supreme Court conducts. Before describing the types and limits of such review it is worth emphasising that judicial review is a process specifically associated with the actions of the Supreme Court. Further to this, the scope of judicial review can be...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,159 others
Register Now