Your Status: Logged out Log in

Should two legal professions be merged into one common profession?  

Member rating: 9 out of 10 stars (4 votes) | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Should two legal professions be merged into one common profession? A major debating point has been whether the two legal professions should be merged into one common profession. The changes made by the (Courts and Legal Services Act 1990) and the (Access to Justice Act 1999) make this idea less necessary. In particular, solicitors with advocacy qualifications can now cover all aspects of the work a client would need. The same is true of barristers who draw a large part of their work from the EU or from surveyors or accountants, as they can also deal with all aspects of a client's case. But there are still arguments that can be put for and against the idea of full fusion. Advantages of fusion - Costs would be reduced. This is the main advantage of fusion, in that clients would save on cost as only one lawyer would be needed. At the...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,159 others
Register Now