Your Status: Logged out Log in

Reforming the rule of Double Jeopardy (notes for a debate)  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

* Good afternoon, my name is Rebecca Stanton and today I'm here to talk about the need for reforming the rule of Double Jeopardy. * We'll talk about the present rules. * The human rights importance and the protection the rules offer * And the need to bring these rulings up to date. * The double jeopardy rule has been part of common law since the 12th century, preventing the state from seeking to retry a defendant whom has already been acquitted or convicted of the offence. * The possibility of reforming these centuries old rulings were raised in the McPherson report, which was the inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence. This report suggested; ".... perhaps in modern conditions the absolute principle may sometimes lead to injustice " * Before we examine the need for reform we must first look into the current status of the rules of double jeopardy * There are two rules that...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk