Your Status: Logged out Log in

Question one: Justify the use of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian or Singaporean legal system  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Tue Oct 17 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Question one: Justify the use of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian or Singaporean legal system Judicial precedent it a very important source of law, without it the law would have no certainty. There are different types of precedent within the law. The first is "original precedent". If a point of law in a case has never been decided before, then the decision of the judge in the case forms an original precedent. "Persuasive precedent" is a precedent that the court does not have to follow, but may be considered when a decision is being made. In some cases, the decisions of courts in other countries may be considered. This is most usual when the country has the same ideas of law to us, which mostly means Commonwealth countries such as Australia. "Binding precedent" is a precedent from another case which must be followed, even if the judge does not...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,187 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk