Your Status: Logged out Log in

Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Thu Feb 12 2004

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 5 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review In his decision in the landmark case, Marbury v. Madison (1803), Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, John Marshall, first established the principle of substantive judicial review in the American Legal System. This establishment was a break from established English Common Law upon which our American system was mostly based, so its radicalism needed to be justified in the unique context of the new United States, especially in the hostile political climate which prevailed at the time of the ruling. The legal action which established substantive judicial review was the ruling by the court that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because it overreached constitutional limitations on court jurisdiction. He put forth several arguments arising out of constitutional language, oaths of public officials, and other sources. Some of these arguments have questionable merit while others are more solid. First, Marshall argued...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk