Your Status: Logged out Log in

Lawless v The Queen - Duties of a Prosecutor: Disclosure of Material Evidence.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 5 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Lawless v The Queen Duties of a Prosecutor: Disclosure of Material Evidence Crown prosecutors are considered ideally as "ministers of justice" who strive impartially to discover the truth in criminal trials. However, the very nature of an adversarial system contravenes this notion, frequently forcing the prosecutor to do the opposite - aiming for a conviction. The High Court case of Lawless1 demonstrates this conflict in the issue of prosecution obligation of disclosure, in which it was held by majority that the prosecution had no duty to disclose material that was of relevance to the defence and that a miscarriage of justice had not occurred. Nonetheless, since this decision, Australian common law has evolved somewhat, recognising that notions of natural justice required such disclosure. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and determine what current law has to say on the matter. Common Law. Duty to Call Witnesses. Lane argued that the...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,187 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk