Your Status: Logged out Log in

Judicial reasoning lacks any distinctive 'legal' features - judges simply make law according to their policy preferences. Discuss.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 28 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 3 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

4.Judicial reasoning lacks any distinctive 'legal' features - judges simply make law according to their policy preferences. Discuss. In coming to a decision, the judges have a lot to consider. Rules are established principles of law which have are acknowledged as precedent and are therefore applied in all cases of similar facts. An example is the rule that no one should be allowed to benefit from his own wrong .On the other hand, due to the experience and large number of cases which the courts deal with, it becomes necessary for them to formulate principles which act as guidelines when making decisions. Judges have a classical role which is to enforce the law as laid down by parliament but in their judicial reasoning, they take common law principles into consideration. For instance in contract law, there are principles which come into play in the event of a breach of contract. Damages...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 149,430 others
Register Now