Your Status: Logged out Log in

In order to discuss the issue raised by the statement of Lord Brandon of Oakbrook, it will be necessary to concentrate on the relevant case law associated with duress and murder.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

CRIMINAL LAW SEMESTER A COURSEWORK 2003-2004 PART B In order to discuss the issue raised by the statement of Lord Brandon of Oakbrook, it will be necessary to concentrate on the relevant case law associated with duress and murder. The defence of duress, when successfully pleaded results in a complete acquittal of the defendant, but it may not be pleaded as a defence to murder. However, in DPP v Lynch1, the 3-2 majority decision of the House of Lords allowed the defence of duress to a murderer who would otherwise be found guilty as a principal in the second degree. It was said to be a "concession to human frailty." This decision was backed up by the Privy Council's 3-2 majority decision in the case of Abbott2 where Lynch was used as an authority for the fact that duress could not be considered by the jury as an...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,383 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk