Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Challenge a decision by means of Judicial Review.
Member rating:
(1 vote)
| Words:
| Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
In the fictional case between the Authority for Regeneration of Inner Cities [ARIC] v Rummidge Society for the Homeless [RSFH] we find ARIC refusing to pay out a grant needed by RSFH to replace the heating system within their shelter for homeless people, located just off Old Street In Rummidge Inner City. RFSH are seeking to challenge this decision by means of Judicial Review. ARIC is refusing to pay out a grant as it stated that "it was not its policy to support initiatives designed to cater for the needs or well being of homeless persons" However, it could be argued that this qualifies this case for Judicial Review on the grounds of Improper Purpose. Section 1 of the [fictional] Inner City Regeneration Act, outlines that in considering applications for grants ARIC should seek "to promote initiatives designed to address problems presented to inner cities by homeless persons". ARIC states that...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,320 others
