Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
This assessment will be looking at the criminal liability of Alan , Basil , Conrad , Donald and Evelyn.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Dec 22 2003
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Criminal law assignment 2003. This assessment will be looking at the criminal liability of Alan , Basil , Conrad , Donald and Evelyn. Alan and Basil criminal liability In order to be liable for a criminal offence mensrea1 and actus rea2 must be present. You are liable for criminal damage if you damage a property that belongs to others. A property can be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporarily impairments of its use or value. In Roe v Kingerlee(1986), the division court held that , graffiti smeared in mud is criminal damage even though it can easily be washed off the reason for this it costs are high and also is time consuming. Therefore Alan and Basil are criminally liable for criminal damage by spraying pigs slay in the local offices. Another authority for this case is R v Henderson & Batley(1984) this case was about dumping waste on a building site that cost...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 146,166 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
