Your Status: Logged out Log in

Reena's criminal liability in respect of Chloe.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Reena's criminal liability in respect of Chloe. In order to assess Reena's criminal liability, we shall look at the possible charges she could face under the Offences Against the Person Act (OAPA) 1861, which deals with non-fatal offences. When Reena surreptitiously removes some screws from Belle's chair and Chloe suffers bruises and scratches by sitting on the chair, Reena's act could constitute a battery: An act by which the defendant intentionally or recklessly inflicts unlawful personal violence upon the victim.1 A battery can be the direct or (as in this case), indirect application of unlawful force to the body of another. Thus in R v Martin2, where the accused placed an iron bar across the exit of a theatre and turned out the lights, he was guilty of inflicting grievous bodily harm (GBH) under s.20 of the OAPA 1861, as the escaping audience were injured when they ran into the bar. Reena could be charged...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk