Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Illinois v. Roy I. Caballes, is currently deciding whether the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion to justify using a drug detection dog to sniff a vehicle during a legitimate traffic stop is being look at by the Supreme Court right now.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Apr 26 2004
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Illinois v. Roy I. Caballes Every day in the United States thousands of motorists are pulled over by the police for a variety of reasons. Most of the time, these drivers are given warnings or tickets and then sent on their way. However, in some cases involving traffic stops, police begin to start investigations into whether a motorist has drugs or other types of contraband in their vehicle through the use of resources such as drug sniffing dogs. An important issue is raised when a person who has been pulled over for a simple speeding infraction can have their car sniffed by dogs for no justifiable reason. In Illinois v. Roy I. Caballes, is currently deciding whether the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion to justify using a drug detection dog to sniff a vehicle during a legitimate traffic stop is being look at by the Supreme Court right now. This case...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 147,038 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
