Your Status: Logged out Log in

Hypothetical cases with respect to the law.  

Member rating: 7 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Mon Nov 17 2003

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Case A Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 creates the offence of theft. It states: 'A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.' In this case, with John being jobless & virtually destitute with a wife and four children to support, feels justified in keeping the money and therefore could attempt to plead necessity. Necessity or 'duress of circumstances' arises where a defendant is forced by circumstances to transgress the criminal law; the generally accepted position is that necessity cannot be a defence to a criminal charge1. Since this country is a welfare state, there is no excuse for keeping the money, thus providing no plausible or legitimate reason to keep the money out of necessity as Lord Denning states: 'I see no reason for destitution, justifying theft with a plea of necessity.' Being realistic, if...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,166 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk