Electric chair, gas chambers, and lethal injection, usually when we hear these words we tend to say, "Oh they deserve it."

Have a little read: ... Electric chair, gas chambers, and lethal injection, usually when we hear these words we tend to say, "Oh they deserve it." What is bad enough to deserve death? Are there certain crimes that do and then some that do not? Almost every culture through out history has relied on capital punishment and justified it as necessary to maintain order. The only thing that has changed over time are the crimes deemed punishable and the methods used to carry out the punishment. In ancient Persia, one method of execution involved being eaten alive by insects and vermin. Other methods included chopping of limbs, boiling in oil, burning at the stake and pressings. Methods of execution have varied from crucifixion in the middle-ages to electrocution and lethal injection in the modern era. Electrocution abolishes the functions of the brain, heart, and nerves by overwhelming the bioelectrical basis of the metabolism, and lethal injection uses the drugs, Thiopental Sodium and potassium chloride which paralyze the heart. However less barbaric than in ancient times some of the methods used to kill nowadays, are often more brutal than those used by the criminal. Many countries have now abolished capital punishment considering it cruel and unusual punishment, and are often reluctant to extradite perpetrators. Yet many countries still enforce it, some still using ancient methods. It costs three times the amount to keep a prisoner on death row than it would to keep them in the prison for life. Today the argument is whether or not the death penalty is morally right. Do we really have the right to kill those who have killed? When we find someone guilty of murder and sentence him to death, do we not make murderers out of ourselves? Is the death penalty a "Cruel and Unusual" punishment or is it a necessary tool in the war on crime? There are three major issues in the capital punishment debate: Deterrence: This suggests that a rational person will avoid criminal behavior if the severity of the punishment outweighs the benefits of the illegal conduct, yet study after study have failed to demonstrate any measurable deterrent effect. The second issue: Retribution: This suggests vengeance, that society should literally interpret the "eye for an eye" principal, when an individual takes a life, the victim and society's moral balance will remain upset until the killer's life is taken. Many