Your Status: Logged out Log in

Defences: Age, Insanity and Automatism  

Member rating: 4 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jan 13 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 3 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

DEFENCES: AGE, INSANITY AND AUTOMATISM - Unit 4.13 * There are several ways in which accused persons may try to prevent themselves from being found guilty of a crime, reduce their liability for the alleged offence, or lower their sentence if convicted. When pleading not guilty, they may challenge the evidence on matters of fact - by arguing that they have an alibi for the time of the offence, or that witnesses who have identified them are mistaken. Alternatively, defendants may admit the offence but argue that there is some reason why they should be leniently sentenced - this is an argument that there are mitigating circumstances. Finally, they may raise a substantive defence, such as self defence, duress or necessity. The effect of a substantive defence is usually to assert that although the accused may have committed the AR with MR, there is a legal reason why he/she should not...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 146,871 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk