Your Status: Logged out Log in

Critically evaluate the defence of provocation  

Member rating: 2 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Critically evaluate the defence of provocation Provocation is a specific defence, only available for murder, and is defined under s3 of the homicide Act 1957. The definition of provocation is 'where someone is charged with murder and there is evidence from which the Jury can find he was provoked by things said, done or both, so that he lost his self-control and that a reasonable man would have behaved as the defendant did in the circumstances, the defendant may be convicted of manslaughter not murder.' There are 2 tests which are broken down into 3 elements. The subjective test asks 'was there provocation?', and 'Did the defendant lose his/her self control?'. The courts must establish 'what can amount to provocation'. The homicide Act 1957 says that things said, done or both can amount to provocation, R V Doughty, a baby crying can amount to provocation. The case of R V Duffy,...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,195 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk