Your Status: Logged out Log in

Consider Vera’s criminal liability  

Member rating: 5 out of 10 stars (2 votes) | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jul 11 2002

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Criminal Law (LA15930) April 2002. Consider Vera's criminal liability: The question of Vera's potential criminal liability must be examined in the context of her conduct, and how her conduct and the intentions behind it relate to the law. In this instance, the area of law that applies to Vera's possible liability, if any, regarding her "use" of Jack's property is the Theft Act 1968; of which, section 1(1), gives a broad if somewhat general definition: "A person is guilty of theft if he/she dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of depriving the other of it; and 'thief' and 'steal' shall be construed accordingly." It is the issues of conduct and intentions that are critical. The above definition would seem at first to be clear and unambiguous, but cases have shown just how both precise and vague the Theft Act can be. The most difficult area is probably in...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 149,430 others
Register Now