Your Status: Logged out Log in

"The law in relation to misrepresentation makes a mockery of the hallowed principle of caveat emptor"  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 28 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

"The law in relation to misrepresentation makes a mockery of the hallowed principle of caveat emptor" Introduction The truth of this statement has to be interpreted. To begin with, what is caveat emptor? Caveat emptor simply means: "let the buyer beware". The basic premise is that the buyer is at his/her own risk when purchasing a product, and should therefore examine it for obvious defects. In comparison with misrepresentation, misrepresentation is a false statement of existing or past fact made by one party of the contract to the other, in which the other party had relied upon. There are many types of misrepresentations, and recently, on this principle, common law made it possible for the injured party, usually a consumer, to sue where there has been a misrepresentation. It is because of this, that some say the caveat emptor principle is diminishing. Yet, on the other hand, others say it is...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,345 others

Register Now