Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
This case has to do with Consideration and promissory estoppel. Was there consideration between the parties, and if not, could Spangles Nightclub go back on their word?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 28 2005
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
This case has to do with Consideration and promissory estoppel. Was there consideration between the parties, and if not, could Spangles Nightclub go back on their word? Also, the issue of whether the contract had been breached because of the late payments made by DJ Rawk. The first thing that needs to be addressed, is that there was a contract between both parties, that DJ Rawk would pay £300 every Friday for 12 months; therefore, this means that there was consideration here. DJ Rawk would use the facilities at Spangles Nightclub, and they would in turn receive payment. After experiencing some difficulties, DJ Rawk was only able to pay some of that money for following 3 weeks. Following that, DJ Rawk and Spangles Nightclub re-formed their contract, and Spangles Nightclub agreed that DJ Rawk should only pay £150 for the summer vacation. The question that must be asked here...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others
