The consequence of accession is clear. Is it equally easy to say when an accession happens or what accedes to what?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 06 2005
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Ryan Amesbury Mansfield College Personal Property Essay: The consequence of accession is clear. Is it equally easy to say when an accession happens or what accedes to what? It is true that once an accession has happened, the property consequences are clear. The 'accessory' accedes to the 'principal', and the interest of the person who owned the accessory is extinguished. If my handle is fixed to your jug, you own the jug-with-handle. The owner of the 'principal' is the owner of the whole. There may, though, be other consequences aside from the extinction of my interest in the handle. Will I be entitled to any form of compensation? Are there any steps you will have to take in order to be fully entitled to the jug as against me? Much of the case law in this area has focused on the difficulty of framing a single test for accession, but there are also interesting...

