Your Status: Logged out Log in

Is it still viable today to maintain a distinction between contract law and tort?  

Member rating: 6 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 5 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

CP01-5752 "Liability for breach of contract is distinguished from liability in tort in that: i) the duties are primarily fixed by law, while on contract they are fixed by the parties themselves; and ii) in tort the duty is towards persons generally while in contract is towards a specific person or persons" (Winfield). Discuss. Is it still viable today to maintain a distinction between contract law and tort? A difficulty lies in locating the law of contract within the spectrum of civil obligations. Contract law is in essence based upon the expectation of a binding promise between individuals, on the basis that these expectations should be fulfilled. Conversely, tort law reflects the principle that a person should be redressed for harm wrongfully inflicted upon them. Current law maintains a distinction between tort and contract as being separate entities with their own criteria, procedures and remedies, although recent case law and statutory...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,328 others

Register Now