Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
For the oral presentation, I was required to take the role of a barrister and represent the defendant of Group B, Mr John Christie and his company Christies, Mr J G Haigh on behalf of JGH Plumbers and Mr C Craig representing his company C Craig and Sons.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Dec 22 2003
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Introduction For the oral presentation, I was required to take the role of a barrister and represent the defendant of Group B, Mr John Christie and his company Christies, Mr J G Haigh on behalf of JGH Plumbers and Mr C Craig representing his company C Craig and Sons. The main argument group A put forward within their case, was the fact that there was a contract between Neil Cream and my three defendants John Christie, John Haigh and Christopher Craig. It was declared that all were in breach of contract since they failed to complete the job satisfactorily. They breeched 'The Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982' as Christies installed a loose floorboard, JGH pierced a nail in the water pipe and Craig and Sons for not working up to standards and incurring extra costs as a result of the inconvenience caused. 'The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977' was used...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others
