Your Status: Logged out Log in

Does the law of England and Wales need a doctrine of common mistake?  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 8 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

DOES THE LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES NEED A DOCTRINE OF COMMON MISTAKE? Traditionally, the area of mistake has been one of vexed curiosity and a lot of misunderstanding. There has never been a single precedent or written rule governing the doctrine of mistake in England and Wales. It was actually believed at one time that the rules governing common mistake were actually established with 'reasonable clearness'1. This view has since been reviewed in modern times as the cases being dealt with got more complex thus requiring the need for a set or rules or regulations to oversee the entire area of law. The doctrine is required so as to provide some uniformity within the law. Lord Atkin in the Bell case2, identified three types of common mistake, "mistakes as to the identifity of the contracting parties", which relates to a mistake in the law, "mistakes as to the existence...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 145,970 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk