Coursework.Info - Inspiration in an Instant

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Contract law assignment Neil cream v JGH plumbers Neil cream v John Christie(carpenters &joiners)Ltd Neil cream v Craig &sons Ltd 1 To establish if there was a contract1 in the first place we have to define what a contract consists of a contract is an a agreement made between two or more people and must legally binding to be recognised by the law. Outline of presentation The counsel for the claimant argued that there was a contract between Mr Neil cream and the defendants. First there was no consideration given by C Craig & sons ltd for Mr cream's promise to pay the extra £5,000 as per Stilk v Myrick (1809) Also in William v Roffey Bros and Nicholas (contractors) ltd (1990) 1 all ER 512 Distinguishable from facts of this case as no penalty clause therefore disbenefit is avoided. The claimant argued since there was no consideration Mr cream doesn't need to pay the extra £5,000...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others