Your Status: Logged out Log in

Contract law - Carlill V Carbolic. - House of Lords Appeal case.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 28 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 13 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

CONTRACT LAW. Carlill V Carbolic. - House of Lords Appeal case. The defendants, the proprietors of a medical preparation called "The Carbolic Smoke Ball," issued an advertisement in which they offered to pay 100l. to any person who contracted the influenza after having used one of their smoke balls in a specified manner and for a specified period. The plaintiff on the faith of the advertisement bought one of the balls, and used it in the manner and for the period specified, but nevertheless contracted the influenza:- Held, affirming the decision of Hawkins, J., that the above facts established a contract by the defendants to pay the plaintiff 100l. in the event which had happened; that such contract was neither a contract by way of wagering within 8 & 9 Vict. c. 109, nor a policy within 14 Geo. 3, c. 48, s. 2; and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover....

To see the full version of this document, and 145,328 others

Register Now