Your Status: Logged out Log in

Compare Hume's Empiricism & Descartes Rationalism  

Member rating: 8 out of 10 stars (2 votes) | Words: | Submitted: Wed Aug 13 2003

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 5 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Compare Hume's Empiricism & Descartes Rationalism What is a Rationalist and what is an Empiricist? We can answer this question on a number of levels, some of which highlight just how much these two traditions have in common, some of which emphasise their opposition. The Rationalist believes that some or all of what is true knowledge is literally inborn with us; the Empiricist believes the opposite: all of our knowledge arises from our perceptual experiences in the world after we are born. The name Rationalism obviously derives from the word 'rational' which itself goes back to the Latin, 'ratio' meaning 'calculation'. This in turn goes back to another Latin word, 'ratus', which is the past participle of 'reor', meaning "think', 'deem', 'judge'. What runs through all of these is the emphasis on mind, an emphasis connected with the word 'rational' as well: rationalise, rationality, and so on. 'Empiricism' derives from...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,159 others
Register Now