Your Status: Logged out Log in

Is it True to Say that any Pareto Efficient Allocation Could be achieved by Lump Sum Redistribution of Endowment? Elaborate your Argument by Using the Edgeworth Box.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jan 26 2004

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Is it True to Say that any Pareto Efficient Allocation Could be achieved by Lump Sum Redistribution of Endowment? Elaborate your Argument by Using the Edgeworth Box. An Allocation is Pareto efficient for a given set of consumer-tastes, resources, and technology, if it is impossible to move to another allocation, which would make some individuals better off, and none worse off. A Pareto-Efficient Allocation must be consumption efficient; Production efficient; and Allocation efficient. Thus, a Pareto Efficient Allocation could only exist when the Marginal Rate of Substitution (a ratio of marginal utilities of consuming two products) and the Marginal Rate of Transformation (a ratio of the marginal costs of producing two products) were equal. Endowment refers to the Factor Endowments of nations, or other producers, and can be defined as the factors of production available to produce goods and services. The size of a country's resource base (natural resources, labour...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,044 others
Register Now