Your Status: Logged out Log in

Zimbardo's Prison study: Do the ends justify the means?  

Member rating: 4 out of 10 stars (6 votes) | Words: | Submitted: Fri Sep 05 2003

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Zimbardo's Prison study: Do the ends justify the means? Zimbardo believed that his 'prison study' justified the means. According to him, his participants didn't show any long-term negative effects. Over the years he had been constructing a report on his participants to see whether there were any negative effects but discovered that they hadn't been affected. He mentions that the participants led normal lifestyles and didn't have re-occurring memories about the prison experience and in fact had learnt that social influence can have an effect on anyone Throughout the short history of psychology one of the most major transformations that have taken place is in regard to what we believe is ethical or not in the experimentation process. E.g. the study by Milgram about obedience is extremely unethical but its still to this day an important part of research, the same applies to the Prison Study by Zimbardo. You wouldn't be...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,044 others
Register Now