Your Status: Logged out Log in

The attention demands of lexical retrieval.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 19 2006

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 16 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

The attention demands of lexical retrieval Abstract. Earlier work has shown that when speakers were asked to name pictures presented simultaneously with conceptually related distracter words their responses on a concurrent tone discrimination task were delayed as much as their picture naming responses (Ferreira & Pashler, 2002). In contrast, phonologically related distracters had little effect on tone discrimination responses. From this it was concluded that lemma selection, but not phoneme section is capacity demanding. By contrast, eye tracking studies show that both lemma selection and phoneme selection are capacity demanding. The present study aimed to explain the discrepancy between the two studies by firstly replicating Ferreira and Pashler's experiment. It was expected that the same pattern of results as in Ferreira and Pashler's experiment would be found. However due to faults with the design of the present experiment unexpected results were obtained. Necessary improvements to the design of the present experiment...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 150,044 others
Register Now