Eyewitness performance in Cognitive and Structured interviews.
Member rating:
(1 vote)
| Words:
| Submitted: Tue Nov 04 2003
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. & Koehnken, G. (1997) Eyewitness performance in Cognitive and Structured Interviews. Memory, 5, 639-655. Eyewitness performance in Cognitive and Structured Interviews Amina Memon[1], University of Texas at Dallas, School of Human Development, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, USA Linsey Wark & Angela Holley Department of Psychology University of Southampton Southampton S017 1BJ U.K. Ray Bull Department of Psychology University of Portsmouth Portsmouth P01 2ER U.K. Guenter Koehnken Institut fur psychologie Universitat Kiel Olshausenstr 40-60 24098 Kiel Germany Keywords: cognitive interview, eyewitness, retrieval, mnemonics, training Abstract This paper addresses two methodological and theoretical questions relating to the Cognitive Interview (CI), which previous research has found to increase witness recall in interviews. (1) To what extent are the effects of the CI mnemonic techniques when communication techniques are held constant? (2) How do trained interviewers compare with untrained interviewers? In this study, witnesses (college students) viewed a short film clip of a shooting and were questioned by interviewers (research assistants) trained in conducting the CI...

